|Subject:||Incorrect Component referenced in Part 2 Annexes, FPT_RCV|
|CC Part #1 Reference:|
|CC Part #2 Reference:||CC Part 2, Annex J.8 (FPT_RCV)|
|CC Part #3 Reference:|
The following text is found in the User Notes for FPT_RCV: "...the dependency from FPT_FLS.1 to ADV_SPM.1 can be argued away." This appears to be a cut-and-paste error from the User Application Notes for FPT_FLS.1.1.
This is a cut and paste error. The text should refer to each component from FPT_RCV, rather than to FPT_FLS.1.
The final sentence of paragraph 1236 in CC Part 2 is reworded as follows:
"If the developer provided a clear definition of the secure state and the reason why it should be considered secure, the dependency from each of the components in FPT_RCV to ADV_SPM.1 can be argued away."Rationale